LoucheBouche

The potty mouth for failed sophisticates

And this is exactly why tablets are changing how we work…

Filed under: Comment | Tags: Financial Times, iPad, Productivity | April 5th, 2011

However, unlike other gadgets, the iPad is not actually meeting-unfriendly. That is because the screen
sits flat on the table and is large enough to give everyone a good view of what you are up to. If MPs wish to shop for groceries, they will have to do so in the public eye. Even e-mailing on an iPad is an unpleasantly exposing activity.

The same is not true of a laptop – where the lid affords a certain privacy. Twice in recent weeks I’ve caught intelligent men in the office hunched over their computers watching a cat trying to insert itself into a small cardboard box on YouTube. When I challenged one of them, he responded by forwarding me a link to a study showing that cutie animal videos boost productivity – which only proved to me that he, like my sons, was so passionate in his defence of mind-addling technology that he has left rationality long behind.

But even if kitty clips were generally believed to be good for concentration, surely the most thick-skinned person would not dare watch them openly in a meeting, let alone in parliament. Standards may have fallen, but they haven’t fallen that far.

Small devices are even more dangerous because we have no scruples about their use at all. When I have a BlackBerry in my hand, I suspend all normal rules of politeness and think nothing of checking messages when someone is talking to me. I know this is very bad, but I’m addicted. Yet just because I do it, that doesn’t mean that I want to have my MP doing the same thing on telly.

Indeed, BlackBerrys and smartphones should not just be banned from the chamber, but from every meeting room in the world. Then all meetings would be more focused and shorter – as everyone would have an interest in rattling through the agenda to get their next e-mail fix.

Lucy Kellaway, Financial Times – 3rd April 2011

FT.com / Management – Tablets to cure our smartphone sicknesses.

The best thing you’ll watch this week [VIDEO]

Filed under: Vids | Tags: Dogs, Forks, YouTube | March 23rd, 2011


Via  LaughingSquid

The European Parliament *still* has a cookie problem: 16 months on…

Filed under: Affiliate Schtuff, Message! | Tags: Affiliate marketing, EU legislation | March 15th, 2011

Back in November ’09, the EU announced a directive that threatens the legitimate use of cookies to track user behavior across the web by technology companies. Now, this directive is becoming law in many member states. It’s amazing how little has changed since I last wrote about it:

This post originally appeared on the Skimlinks Blog 16 months ago.

Yes, some cookies

I had an idea for T-shirt slogan, but you’re probably not going to appreciate it unless
you’re sad enough to go to as many affiliate marketing industry events as I do. It would read:

“Every time you clear your cookies, an affiliate cries.”

Not too hot, right? But at least you, seasoned reader, might have understood where I was going with it. Ask my Mum what ‘clearing cookies’ means and she’ll stare at you blankly and tut-tut, wondering where you’ve picked up such yankee colloquialisms from. You used to be such a nice boy/girl.

The truth is, today’s web users (including my Mum) rely heavily on first party cookies to ensure a smooth browsing experience. Remaining logged into Gmail, heading back to Amazon to be told which comedy DVD to buy; these are tasks and actions we are used to and value as users. I could probably explain that to my mum. Given a couple of weeks…

But the value of third party cookies is less obvious.

The privacy lobby would try to tell you that these super-scary ‘spy cookies’, a phrase coined by EU Commissioner Viviane Reding (see her at 13m20s of this video), are used to track your every online move, spam your cat and seduce your daughter. The reality is very different.

Online advertisers and affiliate marketers depend upon third party tracking cookies in order to be properly rewarded for the promotional actions they take on behalf on brands and retailers. These advertisers fund the free content and services that users have come to expect online, and form the unspoken contract between content producers and consumers. Without them, distribution of free content becomes impossible. Moreover, in the highly liquid market that is e-commerce, any marketing action acts as a signpost for users directing them to useful and relevant sites.

With the CPA model as used by affiliates, this becomes ever-more apparent. My actions as an affiliate would only ever be rewarded when a sale occurs, or in other words, they were found to be useful by a user. These signposts, therefore, are fundamental to the usability of the web and inherently valuable.

Not a cookieThe EU hasn’t bothered to see this side of the story. The 96 pages of contradictory directive recently passed (and much discussed) describe legislation designed to protect user-privacy but do little to define how member states should define privacy or even how user consent could be taken. There appears to be little or no understanding of the very foundation of the internet’s functionality. But there’s no point appealing to our Brusseleir friends now: this legislation will be UK law by June 2011.

At a well attended meeting of the IAB‘s Affiliate Marketing Council yesterday, the Head of Regulatory Affairs, Nick Stringer, gave an outline of what we can expect. As a country, the UK has a tendency to push through legislation like this as drafted and ‘on-the-nod’. That is to say, it’s not likely to be debated in Westminster. It may well pass into UK law sometime in the next two years as ambiguous as ever with the fight to be taken to the courts.

What can we, as an industry, do to counter these dismal prospects? Unfortunately, little at the moment. With an election looming, there is no way to guess when the next government might enact the directive. For now, all we can do is wait and turn the discussion to what technological changes we could implement to preserve our industry if it came to it . Will we end up with other cookie-less tracking? Would the browsers implement a sensible method of consent or will it be left to publishers on their individual sites?

When the time comes, and the new PM is getting comfortable in Number 10, just try and keep us from yelling at those in Westminster to explain the true value of online marketing.

If the next government clears our cookies, it won’t just be a couple of affiliates crying, it will be a whole industry.

I’m the Account Director at Skimlinks. If you want to carry on the discussion, leave a comment below, email me (mark@skimlinks.com) or find me on Twitter (@markofmac). For more information on the legislation, see the great posts at Econsultancy and Out-law.com.

Sonoma in a daze [PIC]

Filed under: Photos | Tags: | March 13th, 2011

 

The Failed Sophisticate’s FourLoko [PIC]

Filed under: Photos | Tags: | February 12th, 2011

Philadelphia’s Historic Society certainly has an eye for detail [PIC]

Filed under: Photos | Tags: Philadelphia historic funny | September 16th, 2010

Message! – Switching to guns

Filed under: Message! | Tags: self-helpless | July 21st, 2010

It’s important to include Top Gun references as much as possible in everyday life. Today’s tip:

“Bullshit! You can be mine!”

Prizes for best usage.

Breaking: Minor (Major?) Hiatus Broken By Mild Bout of Proactivity

Filed under: Personal | Tags: blogging, laziness | July 21st, 2010

Whoa! This shit works. Here we go.

…and here’s a nice picture of Brixton life.

Next stop for the Ramblers' Association: Mars

Filed under: Comment, Sci@Night | Tags: | February 14th, 2007

There’s been a lot of coverage of the new ESA topographic Mars maps, but just in case you missed it, below is an image taken from Sci@Night’s astrobuddy, RidingWithRobots.org.

Topographic Martian Map

With contours and a 3D model, these maps will be accessible on the 25th generation iPhone!

[Mars Express hiking maps] 

UK report supports primate research

Filed under: Comment, Sci@Night | Tags: | December 12th, 2006

Having seen at first hand the terror and fear instilled by a small minority of extremist animal rights activists, not least the strain put on Police resources near my childhood home (Huntingdon Life Sciences, a major target, is located nearby), I realise that the use of primates in research is a topic close to the hearts of many. However, intelligent discussion rather than radical violence is the only route towards an informed debate. Let’s hope that this BBC article, written about the publication of a recent government report, can help add to that dialogue.

The Weatherall report was commissioned by the Academy of Medical Sciences, Royal Society, Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust to review the scientific case for [primate research].

Its chair, Sir David Weatherall, emeritus professor of medicine at Oxford University, said: “There is a scientific case for careful, well-monitored and meticulously regulated non-human primate research, at least for the foreseeable future, provided it is the only way of solving important scientific or medical questions.

“At this moment in time, if we were to take [primate research] away tomorrow, there would be certain areas of science which I think might suffer very greatly,” Sir David added.

A nine-strong working group spent 18 months examining the areas of science where primates are most heavily employed, although it did not look at their use for toxicity testing of medicines.

It concluded non-human primate research remained vital for understanding the basic biology of the brain, neurological diseases, communicable diseases, and some aspects of fertility and ageing.

[UK experts back primate research]